How hard is a company working its assets?
Two companies own $50bn of assets each. One generates $100bn of sales from them; the other generates $20bn. The first is working its assets five times harder. Efficiency ratios — turnover ratios — measure exactly this: how much business a company drives out of what it owns.
Asset turnover: sales per dollar of assets
Asset turnover = revenue ÷ total assets. It answers: for every dollar of assets, how many dollars of sales does the company produce?
- A discount retailer might run asset turnover of 2.5 — huge sales relative to a lean asset base.
- A capital-heavy utility or telecom might run 0.3 — enormous, expensive infrastructure producing comparatively modest revenue.
Neither is "better." A high-turnover business makes its money by moving lots of goods on thin margins; a low-turnover business justifies its heavy assets with fatter margins. Notice the pattern already forming: margin and turnover trade off against each other — and holding that idea is exactly what unlocks the DuPont tree in two lessons.
A worked example
An illustrative supermarket: revenue $120bn, total assets $48bn → asset turnover = 2.5. An illustrative railway: revenue $12bn, total assets $60bn → asset turnover = 0.2. The supermarket spins its assets more than twelve times as fast — but almost certainly earns far less margin on each sale. Same profit can be reached by very different routes: sell a lot at a little, or a little at a lot.
Why it matters
Asset turnover is where the balance sheet and the income statement finally shake hands: it links what a company owns to what it sells. A falling asset turnover over several years can mean assets are growing faster than sales — capacity being added ahead of demand, or older assets no longer pulling their weight. It's a quiet efficiency signal that raw profit numbers hide.
Try it now
Asset turnover is not published anywhere, so you build it from two tables. Revenue first:
Then the asset base it was earned on:
- Divide total revenue by total assets. That is asset turnover, and both figures come from the same fiscal period, which is what makes the division honest.
- Now the contrast. The table below is a retailer, read on trailing figures:
Its trailing revenue alone tells you which of the two moves more goods. To finish the turnover you need its asset base:
- Set the two turnover figures side by side, then set the two net margins beside them: Apple's is net income ÷ total revenue from its income statement above, and the retailer's profit margin is printed in its key-figures table. Notice the trade-off already forming — the business that spins its assets fastest is not the one keeping the most per sale. The next lessons confirm it.